95 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			95 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
+++
 | 
						||
title = "zola - a switch to rust"
 | 
						||
date = 2025-05-16
 | 
						||
authors = ["Aron Petau"]
 | 
						||
description = "revamping my website, futureproofing"
 | 
						||
draft = true
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[taxonomies]
 | 
						||
tags = [
 | 
						||
  "rust",
 | 
						||
  "programming",
 | 
						||
  "static site generator",
 | 
						||
  "blogging",
 | 
						||
  "hosting",
 | 
						||
  "experiment",
 | 
						||
  "private",
 | 
						||
]
 | 
						||
[extra]
 | 
						||
show_copyright = true
 | 
						||
show_shares = true
 | 
						||
featured = false
 | 
						||
toc = true
 | 
						||
toc_sidebar = true
 | 
						||
+++
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## 2020: discovering jekyll
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For applying to my master's program in 2020, a portfolio was required, and since it was more or less for a design program, I wanted to have a nice website.
 | 
						||
After trying for a month to get what I wanted out of WordPress, and angrily quitting multiple times, I discovered [Jekyll](https://jekyllrb.com).
 | 
						||
Back then, [Hugo](https://gohugo.io) and [11ty](https://www.11ty.dev) were the newer kids on the block, but I was heavily relying on the free hosting from [GitHub Pages](https://pages.github.com), where Jekyll was the easiest to integrate.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Back then, looking for inspiration, I had an ethics professor I really liked, and he had a Jekyll site with the [Minimal Mistakes](https://mmistakes.github.io/minimal-mistakes/) theme.
 | 
						||
[Prof. Mühlhoff](https://rainermuehlhoff.de)
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
I went about using Minimal Mistakes, and it was a great experience.
 | 
						||
The resulting portfolio at least got me into the master's, and I fell in love with the general idea of being able to write sites in markdown, while a program would take care of the rest.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
For years, Jekyll was my go-to for building static websites.
 | 
						||
It was familiar, widely supported, and part of the broader Ruby ecosystem.
 | 
						||
But over time, my frustrations grew—slow builds, complicated plugin setups, and a dependency stack that never felt quite right.
 | 
						||
To be honest, many of the drawbacks were totally not Jekyll’s fault. It was just slow, otherwise fine. But especially using GitHub Pages imposed quite a few limitations on plugins and themes.
 | 
						||
Also, maybe I didn’t put in enough effort, but I could never really get theme modifications working. Just extending the theme to show multiple authors was a pain—although it was eventually working.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
On now finishing the master's, I wanted a visual overhaul, and while browsing for inspiration again, using Jekyll at all got questioned again.
 | 
						||
I knew I wanted a static site generator, because markdown is the shit.
 | 
						||
So after looking around further, **[Zola](https://www.getzola.org/)** emerged—actually through a chatbot suggestion 😄
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Recently, I made the leap to Zola, a Rust-powered static site generator, and I don't see myself going back.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
---
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## rust feels right
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
I’ve always admired [Rust](https://www.rust-lang.org/) for its speed, safety, and modern tooling.
 | 
						||
Using a static site generator built with Rust just made sense. **Zola is fast**—blazing fast.
 | 
						||
Even during local development, rebuilds are near-instant, and that alone makes the writing process smoother and more enjoyable.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Plus, using something written in Rust means fewer external dependencies, no bundler hell, and zero Ruby setup headaches.
 | 
						||
I can just download the binary, run it, and get going. It respects my time.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
---
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## zola is thoughtfully designed
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Beyond performance, Zola is just really well designed.
 | 
						||
Its template syntax (thanks to [Tera](https://tera.netlify.app)) is more powerful and readable than Liquid.
 | 
						||
The built-in shortcodes, pagination, and asset pipelines all feel cohesive and purposeful.
 | 
						||
There’s very little “configuration over convention” fatigue that Jekyll often gave me.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
And even though both systems are markdown-based, migrating wasn’t just a matter of copy-pasting files.
 | 
						||
I had to rethink frontmatter, adjust templates, and wrangle image paths and shortcodes.
 | 
						||
The structure and behavior are different enough that it felt like a real rebuild—not just a port.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
---
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## duckquill made me switch
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The real catalyst, though? [**Duckquill**](https://github.com/daudix/duckquill), a stunning Zola theme built by [Daudix](https://github.com/daudix).
 | 
						||
It struck the perfect balance between minimalism and elegance—exactly the aesthetic I wanted but could never quite achieve with Jekyll.
 | 
						||
Duckquill didn’t just make Zola usable for me; it made it _irresistible_.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
What really sets **Duckquill** apart—beyond its clean typography and smart layout—is how well it supports a vision of digital autonomy.
 | 
						||
The theme comes with **Mastodon-powered comments**, allowing for lightweight, federated interaction without relying on big centralized platforms.
 | 
						||
This fits perfectly with my goal of reclaiming control through **self-hosting**.
 | 
						||
Whether it's running my own site, owning my content, or interacting through the fediverse, Duckquill reinforces those values rather than working against them.
 | 
						||
It’s a rare example of design and infrastructure aligning with personal principles.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
---
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## final thoughts
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Switching from Jekyll to Zola wasn’t effortless, but it was absolutely worth it.
 | 
						||
I now have a faster, more reliable, and better-looking site that’s easier to maintain and feels like it fits my tooling philosophy.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
If you're feeling the weight of your current setup, maybe it's time to try Zola—and give Duckquill a spin while you're at it.
 |